Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 2005PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Hagan Smith, appeals the judgment of sentence entered March 31, 2004, finding him guilty of a summary violation of the Fish and Boat Code.1 On appeal, appellant claims' that the record is inaccurate, and that the lower court erred by violating his due process rights under the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions. We affirm.2

¶ 2 The relevant factual history is as follows. On July 26, 2003, appellant and another individual, Henry Goetzmann, Jr., went fishing from the vicinity of the Walnut Creek Marina using a twenty-one foot Proline boat. N.T.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. MayberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. AppelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. GosselinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Com. v. Bieber, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Com. v. Blackburn, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Com. v. Brown D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Chibber, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Crawford, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API