Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Burnside

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1993No. 2834PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal as of right from an order suppressing contraband seized from appellee, Nathaniel Burnside, at the time of his arrest. The appeal is properly before this court because the Commonwealth has certified that suppression of the physical evidence substantially handicaps the prosecution of this case. See Pa.R.A.P., Rule 311(d), 42 Pa.C.S. (Commonwealth Appeals as of Right in Criminal Cases). For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

On January 11, 1992, at approximately 10:15 p.m., a uniformed Philadelphia police officer observed appellee, who was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. OglialoroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. KaziorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. TuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. CottmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. MesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API