Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Independence Township

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 14, 2006No. 05-2275PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

The individual defendants appeal the District Court’s denial of their qualified immunity defense at the dismissal stage. The District Court found that the allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint adequately plead the commission of acts that violate extremely broad, general propositions of law, and, therefore, denied qualified immunity at the dismissal stage. Today, we make clear that a qualified immunity determination must be made in light of the specific factual context of the case, and when a complaint fashioned under the simplified notice pleading standard of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  2. Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Thomas v. Independence TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Lozman v. City of Riviera BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  5. Geist v. AmmaryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API