Legal Opinion

State v. S. M. B. (In re S. M. B.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 2018No. A164738Published

1Per curiam

*281*582Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting her from purchasing or possessing firearms. See ORS 426.130. In her first assignment of error, appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to comply with ORS 426.100(1).1 She argues, in part, that the court plainly erred by not advising her of the information and rights required by that subsection of the statute, which provides:

"At the time the person alleged to have a mental illness is brought before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. K. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API