Legal Opinion

Copeland v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 23, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2014-1708Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BARBARA COPELAND, ) Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. 14-1708 (RJL) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 22" $0) [Dkt. # 47] Plaintiff Barbara Copeland (“Copeland” or “plaintiff’”) worked as a Correction Treatment Specialist at the District of Columbia Department of Corrections (“DOC”) between 1988 and 2017. Plaintiff brings this suit against the District of Columbia (“the District” or “defendant”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging hostile work environment sexual harassment, quid pro quo…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API