Legal Opinion

In Re Doughty

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 17, 2003No. 163, 2003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. The respondent, Stephen Doughty, is a Delaware lawyer who is a partner in a New Jersey law firm. The primary allegations are that Doughty, for many years, practiced law in Delaware without maintaining a bona fide office in Delaware, failed to maintain his books and records in compliance with Delaware law, and falsely certified to this Court that his books and records were being maintained in compliance with Delaware law and that his tax obligations were being met. While Doughty admitted most of the facts underlying the petition for discipline, he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  4. In Re a Member of the Bar of the State MeklerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re FroelichSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: KoysteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Becket Benedict Hinckley, Wsb 6-3434Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In the Matter of KingsleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Matter of a Member of the Bar: BeauregardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API