Sangster v. California Horse Racing Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1036Opinion
WOODS, P. J.
Appellant Robert E. Sangster (Sangster) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Respondents are the California Horse Racing Board (the Board), and William Gumpert and others (Gumpert) who were the real parties in interest in the proceedings below.
The facts are as follows:1 Sangster owns a horse named The Noble Player. The Noble Player entered the San Matean Handicap run at Bay Meadows Race Track on September 15, 1984. The San Matean carried a statutory purse of $35,000 “added” plus a $5,000 “Breeders’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Youst v. LongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sweeney v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Sweeney v. California Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1996
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1994