Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1963PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The defendant was indicted in two counts for the crimes of statutory rape and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. A jury acquitted the defendant of the crime of statutory rape and returned a verdict of guilty on the contributing charge. From the verdict of guilty the defendant appeals.

The defendant contends that since the jury acquitted him of the crime of statutory rape, and that ■act is the act relied upon as the act manifestly tending to cause the minor child’s delinquency, this acquittal is res judicata of the facts relied upon to sustain the guilty verdict returned.

Two separate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API