Miami International Realty Co. v. Town of Mt. Crested Butte
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
On February 14, 1983, plaintiff amended its original complaint to include claims for monetary and injunctive relief for violation of federal antitrust laws. The complaint alleges that defendants conspired to prohibit plaintiff from engaging in the business of selling condominium time shares. Plaintiff’s factual allegations are more fully detailed in my earlier orders of January 23, 1984 (579 F.Supp. 68) and July 11, 1984. A pre-trial conference was held before United States Magistrate Schauer on June 24,1984 and trial to a jury is set…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goebel v. Colorado Department of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Opdyke Investment Company v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- COUNTY OF OAKLAND BY KUHN v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- John Woolen, John D. Campisi, Individually and as Class Action , and Carl Whorton, Intervenors-Appellants v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc., Ken Whorton v. City of Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.