Legal Opinion
COUNTY OF OAKLAND BY KUHN v. City of Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 14, 1992No. 84-71068PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Plaintiff County of Oakland and intervening plaintiff County of Macomb filed the instant civil action in 1984 to recover damages from defendants for allegedly violating the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [“RICO”], 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68. 1 Plaintiffs named as defendants 14 officials and corporations, including the City of Detroit and Mayor Coleman A. Young. Plaintiffs allege that defendants conspired to violate the antitrust and racketeering laws by excluding competition, illegally fixing the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rini v. ZwirnDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Albert Malvino v. Paul DelluniversitaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- First American Corp. v. Al-NahyanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Smith v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Schimpf v. Gerald, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.