Legal Opinion
Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 8, 1985No. Civ. A. 3-78-609, 3-78-745PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY LOU ROBINSON, District Judge.
The factual allegations in these antitrust actions have already been reported twice and need not be repeated at length here. See Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, 461 F.Supp. 1025 (N.D.Tex.1978) (denying motions to dismiss); Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, 684 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1982) (vacating order denying intervention). In a nutshell, the plaintiff taxicab drivers claim that the defendants have excluded them from the outbound taxicab market at the Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport since the airport’s opening in 1974, in violation of the Sherman Act.
Recent…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Opdyke Investment Company v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- John Woolen, John D. Campisi, Individually and as Class Action , and Carl Whorton, Intervenors-Appellants v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc., Ken Whorton v. City of Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Sweeney v. Athens Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.