Legal Opinion

United States v. Raphyal Crawford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2003No. 01-50633PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to a mandatory condition of Raphyal Crawford’s parole, FBI agents entered Crawford’s home to conduct a “parole search” on July 27, 2000. The agents conducted the search despite the fact that they expected to find absolutely no evidence of a crime on the premises, because they thought it would help pressure Crawford into talking about his role in an unsolved robbery committed two years before. Less than two hours later, Crawford confessed to participating in the robbery.

We hold that the search of Crawford’s home without any reasonable suspicion, although…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. LampitokIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. People v. MossIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API