Legal Opinion

McInnis v. Brown County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1931No. 7585PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal in a condemnation proceeding in which judgment was rendered condemning the fee to a portion of appellants' land and an easement upon other portions.

Appellee, plaintiff below, is a water improvement district, created under the provisions of chapter 2 of title 128, R.S. of 1925 (article 7622 et seq.). Its general purpose was to construct a large reservoir by damming the waters of Pecan bayou, in order to provide a water supply for the city of Brownwood. This dam when constructed would permanently inundate a portion of appellants' lands bordering on the stream and some of its tributaries…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. NalleTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. City of San Antonio v. GrandjeanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Buffalo Bayou, Brazos & Colorado Railroad v. FerrisTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. City of Dallas v. PeacockTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Gulf Coast Irrigation Co. v. GaryTexas Supreme Court · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Maher v. LasaterTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City of Carrollton v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API