Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J
Prior to the trial of this case the parties stipulated and agreed as follows:
One. The defendant in this case is American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company, formerly Hardware Mutual Insurance Company of Minnesota: the American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company is the proper defendant to this action and before the court, and it has not been prejudiced or misled by reason of any improper identification.
Two. On 10 April 1953 there was outstanding a valid policy of defendant’s garage liability insurance providing for the payment of medical bills up to a limit of $2,000.00, which might be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Britton v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Burton v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Graham v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. WendlingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Textile Insurance v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Clark v. GASTONIA ICE CREAM COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Textile Insurance Company v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.