Legal Opinion
Pintel v. K. N. H. Mohamed & Bros.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1951No. Civ. 18609PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Appellant Pintel doing business as California Trading Company sued defendants, a partnership with domicile in Ceylon, herein referred to as Mohamed, for breach of contract. Ancillary to his action he caused the attachment of a certain check in the possession of the California Bank at Los Angeles. While it was in the custody of the sheriff, respondent, Mercantile Bank of India, filed a third party claim -‘(Code Civ. Proc., § 689) to the check and the proceeds to be 'derived therefrom. Following a trial of the claim and delivery (action, the court below determined respondent to be owner of ghe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lamborn v. Lake Shore Banking & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dwight A. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hanna P. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Rialto Publishing Company and Triad Newspapers, Inc. v. Irving I. Bass, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of McDaniel Markets, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Barron v. TattenhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- McNall v. TathamDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.