Legal Opinion

Barron v. Tattenham

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1962No. Civ. 19824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Theodore Barron from a judgment holding that an alimony and child support lien of intervener Alix Tattenham was prior and superior to plaintiff’s attachment lien.

The facts are undisputed. On November 23, 1959, intervener Alix Tattenham was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce from Robert Tattenham, said decree providing that Robert Tattenham pay Alix Tattenham $1.00 per month alimony and $55 per month for the support and maintenance of each of the parties’ two children. Robert Tattenham failed to make the payments as ordered and Alix Tattenham applied to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Pintel v. K. N. H. Mohamed & Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Brun v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank of Roseville v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. In Re Marriage of FinnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API