Legal Opinion

City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1989No. S006651Published

1Opinion of the Court

49 Cal.3d 74 (1989)

776 P.2d 222

260 Cal. Rptr. 520

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, Petitioner,

v.

THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE SANTA CRUZ JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, Respondent; HOWARD KENNEDY, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. S006651.

Supreme Court of California.

July 27, 1989.

COUNSEL

Gerald D. Bowden, John G. Barisone and Atchison & Anderson for Petitioner.

William B. Sage, City Attorney (Huntington Beach), John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Joel Carey and Derald Granberg, Deputy Attorneys General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

No…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API