Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1989No. S006651Published

1Dissent

*95LUCAS, C. J.

I respectfully dissent. Like Justice Panelli, I am concerned that the majority’s holding will lead to burdensome demands for discovery in situations not contemplated by the Legislature. Fortunately, the Legislature retains the authority to review this decision and take appropriate responsive action.

PANELLI, J.

I respectfully disagree with the interpretation of the good cause requirement of Evidence Code section 1043, subdivision (b) offered by the majority opinion. Unlike the majority, I strongly believe that, in enacting Senate Bill No. 1436, 1977-1978 Regular Session (Stats.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United States v. Louis C. Andrus, George E. Collett, William J. Lutson, Billy Ray Whittington, and Larry Thomas WhittingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API