Simplex Window Co. v. Hauser Reversible Window Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; Frank H. Rudkin, Judge. _ _ Suit in equity by the Simplex Window Company against the Hauser Reversible Window Company, Frederick Hauser, and Jessie Hauser. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This suit was commenced in the court below by the present appellant against the appellees, for the alleged infringement of two certain letters patent, numbered, respectively, 1,072,669 and 1,159,604. After trial the court held that there was no infringement, and accordingly gave judgment for the defendants to the suit, resulting in the present appeal by the complainant.
[1] In this court the appellant has abandoned all claims under its patent numbered 1,159,604, and contends for a reversal of the judgment only by reason of its first patent. For the appellees it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- IVES v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Murray v. Detroit Wire Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Morton v. LlewellynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Sodemann Heat & Power Co. v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Etten v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Bake-Rite Mfg. Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Magnavox Co. v. Hart & RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.