State v. Bowman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
When conception occurs during the marriage of its mother, a child is presumed to be the legitimate offspring of the then husband of the mother, notwithstanding it is born after the termination of the marriage. Rhyne v. Hoffman, 59 U.C. 335. The presumption of legitimacy arising in such case is not conclusive, but may be rebutted by evidence which proves that the husband could not have been the father because he was impotent or did not have access to the mother at the time the child was begotten. Ray v. Ray, 219 N.C. 217, 13 S.E. 2d 224; S. v. Green, 210 N.C. 162, 185 S.E. 670; Ewell v. Ewell,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ray Ex Rel. Gudger v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Boykin v. . BoykinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State v. Pettaway.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
- Ewell v. EwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- R.R.K. v. S.G.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- JD v. MdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. CampoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.