Legal Opinion

Ray Ex Rel. Gudger v. Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1941PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.

Under the old English or common law rule a child born of a married woman was presumed legitimate unless the husband was shown to be impotent or not within the four seas — that is, he was conclusively presumed to be legitimate so long as there remained a possibility that the husband was the father. The presumption could not be rebutted if the husband was capable of procreation and was within the four seas during the period of gestation. S. v. Pettaway, 10 N. C., 623; Woodward v. Blue, 107 N. C., 407; S. v. Liles, 134 N. C., 735; Ewell v. Ewell, 163 N. C., 233, 79 S. E., 509; West v. Redmond,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Woodward v. . BlueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. Pettaway.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
  4. Ewell v. EwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Carpenter v. HawleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In Re Rowe's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. CampoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State ex rel. J. L. K. v. R. A. I.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API