Legal Opinion

State v. Campo

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1950No. 506PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The trial court inadvertently allowed the legitimacy of the child, Judy Ann, to be injected into the hearing when there was no competent evidence to raise the issue and the defendant was not making the point. The court in its charge, after “chasing this rabbit” with some loss of track now and then, finally instructed the jury, as he should have done when the matter was first broached, to disregard the whole debate as inconsequential and pointless or without substance in the case. All the evidence on the issue purports to come from the prosecuting witness who may not speak to the subject. S.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. . BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. HamerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API