Legal Opinion

Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Rain-Boldt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1933No. 1397PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

Appellee, I. N. Rainboldt, for himself individually and as next friend for his 6 year old girl, instituted this suit against appellants, Dr. Pepper Bottling Company, a corporation, Henry Sehroeder, and F. A. Graham, to recover damages in the sum of $40,-000 for personal injuries suffered by his child, Wanda Louise Rainboldt, and $8,700 for doctor, medicine, and hospital bills which appellee, I. N. Rainboldt, alleged he had become obligated to, and had in part paid. For a full statement of the case, see Dr. Pepper Bottling Company et al. v. Rainboldt et al. (Tex. Civ. App.)…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. CanodeTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Shannon v. Western Indemnity Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Mikell v. La BethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Terrell Wells Health Resort, Inc. v. SevereidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API