Legal Opinion
Ragin v. Royal Globe Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1983No. 2078PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:
On April 18, 1979, appellant was injured when the automobile he was driving collided with that of another driver. As a result of his claim against the other driver, Aetna Insurance Company, the other driver’s insurer, paid him $15,000. This was the maximum amount appellant could recover under that driver’s insurance policy. Since appellant believed that this amount did not fully compensate him for his injuries, he filed a claim with his own insurer, appellee, Royal Globe Insurance Company (“Royal Globe”), seeking to recover additional sums under the uninsured motorist provision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Keller v. Local 249 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Geisler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HeintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Arthur J. Lacourse, on Behalf of the Estate of Peter Lacourse, Deceased v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Popskyj v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Bromley v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.