Legal Opinion

Krysinski v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: A municipality may specify, as a necessary condition precedent to bringing a personal injury action, that prior written notice of defect be established (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [4]; Leary v City of Rochester, 115 AD2d 260, affd 67 NY2d 866; Zimmerman v City of Niagara Falls, 112 AD2d 17; Drzewiecki v City of Buffalo, 51 AD2d 870, 871). In support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant established that its City Charter contains a prior written notice requirement. In addition, defendant submitted affidavits *892by several city…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drzewiecki v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Leary v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Leary v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Waring v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Zimmerman v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dobransky v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Keeler v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API