Legal Opinion
Keeler v. City of Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree that defendant city is entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ negligence cause of action but not on the grounds specified by Special Term, to wit, that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff’s injuries resulted when she tripped and fell due to an allegedly defective sidewalk in the City of Syracuse. A notice of claim was timely served within 90 days of the incident, and the summons and complaint were also served within one year and 90 days therefrom. Plaintiffs concede…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Muszynski v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Muszynski v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Barrett v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Leary v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hogan v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hart v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Dobransky v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Scovazzo v. Town of TonawandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- SCOVAZZO, GENEVIEVE v. TOWN OF TONAWANDAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011