Legal Opinion
Dobransky v. City of Watertown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, defendant City of Watertown’s motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured when she fell on a portion of the sidewalk located in front of the J. C. *998Penney store in the City of Watertown. She alleges that her fall was caused by a defective condition of the sidewalk. A notice of claim was timely served within 90 days of the incident, and the summons and complaint were also served within one year and 90 days therefrom. Defendant City of Watertown contends that the complaint fails to state a cause of action because it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blake v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Klimek v. Town of GhentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Blake v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Muszynski v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Muszynski v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Oswald v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Lalley v. Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Leon v. City of JamestownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Wilson v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994