Legal Opinion

Carlson v. AFSCME

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 1985No. C-166-81; CA A31372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Respondents - cross-petitioners (respondents) petition for reconsideration of an order awarding attorney fees on appeal to petitioners - cross-respondents (the local). We allow the-petition and vacate the order. ORAP 10.10.

After our decision on the merits, 73 Or App 755, 700 P2d 260 (1985), the local filed a timely petition for attorney fees, relying on ORS 19.220 and ORS 243.672(2)(d) as authority for the award. We overruled respondents’ objections and awarded attorney fees.

This case involves an unfair labor practice complaint filed by respondents, designated as the “complainants,” with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carlson v. AFSCMECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. Jantzen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API