Legal Opinion

Sangster v. Spangler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1975No. 11896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting judgment on the pleadings pursuant to I. R.C.P. 12(c). The order entering judgment for respondent is based on the narrow ground that the pleadings indicate the release of defendant-respondent Earl Spangler, Sr., from all liability and therefore, as to him, leave no material issue of fact in dispute. We reverse.

This action was instituted in October 1971 by appellant Lila Rose Sangster as executrix of the estate of her husband. The substance of the claim was for con*187version of a tractor loaned to Spangler and his wife and retained by them…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stiebel v. . GrosbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Boise Street Car Co. v. Van AveryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Southland Produce Company v. BelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Halloran v. FischerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Pevesdorf v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Large v. MayesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Large v. MayesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API