Legal Opinion · Dissent

Large v. Mayes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1979No. 13024Published

1DissentBistline, J.

I am unable to join in the Court’s decision to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed— thereby terminating the action without reaching the merits of the appeal now, or ever. As we noted in Bunn v. Bunn, 99 Idaho 710, 587 P.2d 1245 (1978), the history of jurisprudence in Idaho, both before and after the advent of the “federal” rules of civil procedure, displays judicial policy of long standing in Idaho that controversial litigation be determined and disposed of each on its own particular facts, and it is no less so that there be a determination of appeals on their merits, not on technicalities.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API