Legal Opinion

Halloran v. Fischer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 8, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance of rent claimed to be overdue. The case was tried by the court and judgment entered for the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed. From the finding, with such corrections as the defendant is entitled to, the material facts are as follows: On March 9, 1938, the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff for back rent in the sum of $515. The plaintiff had endeavored to collect this amount through attorneys, but without result. The defendant had threatened to go into bankruptcy unless the plaintiff compromised for the sum of $200,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Goodrich v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  4. Grippo v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  5. Stiebel v. . GrosbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Gillis v. GillisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Kelley v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Taft v. Valley Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Themper v. ThemperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API