Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1934No. 21930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The parties to this action appear here as they appeared in the trial court, and will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.

This cause is before this court on a transcript of the record of the district court of Tulsa county. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition and dismissed the action. From that order of the court an appeal was taken to this court.

There was no complaint of extraneous fraud. The alleged perjured testimony did not relate to extraneous facts. The same is true as to the alleged suppression of testimony.

Under the rule stated in Thigpen v. Deutsch et…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Thigpen v. DeutschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Burton v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Dooley v. ForemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Miller v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gaines Bros. Co. v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Higgins v. ClassenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Wilson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Walter v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API