Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Duncan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 28, 1941No. 28095PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
Plaintiff in error, a full-blood member of the Osage Tribe of Indians, commenced this action as plaintiff on September 28, 1936, against her former guardian and the surety on said guardian’s bond, appearing herein as defendants in error.
In her petition she complained of allegedly unlawful disbursements by Duncan, said guardian, of more than $11,000 of her allegedly restricted funds without the authorization or approval of any of the proper officials of the Osage Agency or the Department of the Interior, but mentioned that said Duncan had “filed in the county court what purported to be a final…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Norris v. HagginSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Abels v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sheehan v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District Ex Rel. Johnson CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Drum v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Guadalupe Guadalupe v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
- Guadalupe Guadalupe v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
- Young v. Union Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949