Legal Opinion

Menchaca v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1996No. 21918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying Jose Menchaca’s application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

In separate criminal actions, Menchaea pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, I.C. § 37-2732(a), and driving without privileges (DWP), I.C. § 18-8001. For both offenses, Menchaea was sentenced to a term of confinement in the custody of the State Board of Correction. After initially retaining jurisdiction pursuant to I.C. § 19-2601(4), so that Menchaea could participate in the “rider” program at the North Idaho Correctional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aeschliman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. MayerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Kuehl v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API