Legal Opinion

Aeschliman v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1999No. 24054PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Chief Judge.

Danny R. Aeschliman appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of Aeschliman’s application for post-conviction relief. Aeschliman contends that he has a constitutional right to civil discovery and that there were material issues of fact raised in his application. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

Aeschliman was arrested and charged with second degree murder for the beating death of his wife. At the time of the preliminary hearing, he agreed to a plea bargain. However, Aeschliman subsequently rejected the plea agreement and entered a plea of not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Murphy v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. LePageIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Murillo v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API