Aeschliman v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Chief Judge.
Danny R. Aeschliman appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of Aeschliman’s application for post-conviction relief. Aeschliman contends that he has a constitutional right to civil discovery and that there were material issues of fact raised in his application. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
Aeschliman was arrested and charged with second degree murder for the beating death of his wife. At the time of the preliminary hearing, he agreed to a plea bargain. However, Aeschliman subsequently rejected the plea agreement and entered a plea of not…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Murphy v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. LePageIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- Murillo v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.