Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Valley Mechanical

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1992No. 90-09177; CA A69753PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that denied his aggravation claim. We affirm.

Claimant was injured in 1984. His aggravation rights expired on December 10, 1989. On November 15, 1989, his employer received chart notes from his chiropractor. Employer treated the notes as a claim for aggravation, which it denied.

On April 30,1990, claimant requested a hearing on the denial. The hearing was convened on July 3, 1990. The referee, applying 1990 amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Law, affirmed employer’s denial. She concluded, first, that the doctor’s chart notes did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanley Smith Security v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Bird v. Bohemia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Taylor v. MillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Coble v. T. W. Kraus & SonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API