Legal Opinion

Halleck v. HALLECK

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1959PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiff asserts that he has title to the property in question through the execution and delivery of a deed dated September 22, 1950 by which Charles A. Bickford, the grantor, conveyed the property “unto said T. H. Halleck and Theron H. Halleck, not as tenants in common but with the right of survivorship, their assigns and the heirs of such survivor,” this language being a printed part of a deed form in wide use in this state. The deed records of Lincoln County show that Charles A. Bickford was the grantee named in a deed covering the same property dated…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bear v. Millikin Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Erickson v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Albro v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Church v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Durant v. HamrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API