Legal Opinion

Cockerham v. Children's Aid Society

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1945No. [No. 53, January Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

Appellants, father and mother of a daughter, now eighteen months old, filed a petition under Flack’s Anno tated Code, 1939, Article 42, Section 21, for a writ of habeas corpus, directed to the appellee, to secure the custody of their child, previously committed to the appellee by a trial magistrate of Cecil County. After a hearing in the Circuit Court for Cecil County, Judge Constable remanded the child to the custody of the appellee, subject to the further order of the Court. The case comes here on appeal from this order. There are no questions of law involved, and the sole question for our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  2. Piotrowski v. State Ex Rel. KowalekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Tull v. TullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. De Angelis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Yorkdale Corp. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Burns v. BinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Montgomery County Department of Social Services v. SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API