Legal Opinion
McClain v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 9, 1980No. [No. 94, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Murphy, C. J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 471 infra.
*458We are presented with two questions in this case: (1) Whether appellant James McClain preserved for appellate review the issue of whether statements obtained from him in violation of Maryland District Rule 709 a were not admissible in evidence, as we ultimately held in Johnson v. State, 282 Md. 314, 384 A.2d 709 (1978), and if so (2) whether Johnson is applicable to a case tried before our decision there but reached for appellate review after that decision. We answer both questions in the affirmative. Hence, we shall…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Polakoff v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.