Montgomery County Department of Social Services v. Sanders
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.
The United Nations Declaration states that “[mjankind owes to a child the best it has to give.” Very few persons will quarrel with the tenor of that assertion. What gives rise to controversy is not the general proposition of mankind’s obligation to provide what is best for the child, but rather, what is best. The theoretical best mankind can provide is not always the best that society, through its courts, can implement. Consistently, the courts of Maryland have endeavored, in custody cases, to look to the “best interest” of the child. See e.g., Ross v. Hoffman, 280 Md. 172, 175, 372 A. 2d…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Epperson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Domingues v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Petrini v. PetriniCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.