Legal Opinion

State v. Combest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2015No. 201203470; A151950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for multiple counts of encouraging child sexual abuse, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Defendant shared files, including files containing child pornography, on a peer-to-peer computer network. Using software called Shareaza LE, officers accessed that peer-to-peer network; searched for shared files that, in light of file name and other attributes, were likely child pornography; identified an IP address for a user sharing those files; and then downloaded two files from that user. They later identified…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. StultsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. PerrineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DulfuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. NakhiengchahnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. BaricCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  5. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API