Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2015No. 11C47283; A151868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals judgments convicting him of 20 counts of first-degree encouraging child sexual abuse, ORS 163.684 (2009), amended by Or Laws 2011, ch 515, § 3, based on child pornography files that the police discovered on his computer.1 He contends in his first assignment of error that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that the police had obtained “utiliz[ing] a computer program that constantly searches peer-to-peer computer networks for suspected child pornography, logs any computers that respond, and logs and geolocates the IP [Internet Protocol] addresses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WackerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CombestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API