Legal Opinion

Antonio Lipari v. Maritime Overseas Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 1974No. 73-1448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves a claim for maintenance and cure brought by the plaintiff (appellee) seaman Lipari, against the defendant (appellant) shipowner Maritime Overseas Corporation (hereinafter “Maritime”).

On October 29, 1969 plaintiff instituted a suit against Maritime claiming damages under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688), as a result of an accident sustained by him while a member of the crew of defendant’s vessel “Overseas Traveller”. The accident had occurred on August 15, 1969 when without warning, a boom fell toward, but did not reach, the deck on which Lipari was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Helen Reabe Sobosle v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. Murphy v. American Barge Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Daniel A. Desmond, Libelant-Appellee-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Singleton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Coughenour v. Campbell Barge Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Seifried v. Mon River Towing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Antonio Lipari v. Maritime Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Beasley, Vincent EricCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API