Legal Opinion

Daniel A. Desmond, Libelant-Appellee-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 2, 1954No. 23129_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. We affirm the trial judge’s dismissal of the negligence action on the basis of his excellent opinion, reported in 105 F.Supp. 9.

2. He found that libelant had reached “the point of maximum cure” on August 26,1951, exactly five years after his admission to the U. S. Marine Hospital. But the evidence introduced by libelant shows his condition to have been incurable — and recognized as incurable — before the period for which maintenance and cure have been allowed. Libelant’s sole medical witness was a physician who had not treated him but had examined him in 1948 and again…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Muruaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Lindgren v. Shepard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vella v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Harry Holmes v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Vitco v. JoncichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  4. Lewis v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Whitman v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API