Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians v. Eischen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 15, 1957No. 36,784PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
This is a proceeding in quo warranto brought by Associated Master Barbers and Beauticians of Minnesota, and its officers, to ascertain whether respondents, Joseph Eischen and Peter Odegard, possess the qualifications prescribed by M. S. A. 154.22 for membership on the State Board of Barber Examiners to which they were appointed by the governor on July 22, 1955.
Section 154.22 provides in part that:
“* * * Each member shall be a practical barber who has followed the occupation of a barber in this state for at least five years immediately prior to his appointment. Each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State ex rel. Childs v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Smith v. People ex rel. FrisbieIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- State ex rel. Probstfield v. SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- State ex rel. Johnson v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Youngwirth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Bauerle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967