State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door Sedan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is a proceeding under M. S. A. 97.50, subd. 2, by the state to confiscate an automobile used for the purpose of spotting a deer by means of the rays of a spotlight in violation of § 100.29, subd. 1(10).
Two questions have been raised, viz.: (1) Whether the evidence sustains a finding that Marvin Bollig was the owner of the automobile; and (2) whether the statute under which the proceedings were had is unconstitutional by reason of the fact that the enrolled bill approved by the governor differs in numerous respects from the bill actually passed by the legislature.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Jenning v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. LuscherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. One Buick Sedan AutomobileSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Phelps v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Mercil v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.