Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bolding

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1983No. 712PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

We affirm the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying appellant’s, Lawrence Bold-ing’s, Post-Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) Petition. 19 P.S. §§ 1180-1 et seq., as amended; reenacted as 42 Pa.C. S.A. §§ 9541-9551.

On appeal, appellant asserts, in essence, that his plea of guilty to kidnapping, conspiracy and theft by extortion was invalid, and, therefore, subject to being withdrawn for failure to comply with the mandates of Pa.R.Crim.P. 319(a) and Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198, 316 A.2d 77 (1974). Additionally, appellant, by way of analogy to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ViaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. RispoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. MauteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. TylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API