Legal Opinion
United States v. Ernest Mendel and Albert Mendel & Son, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 16, 1984No. Cal. 1406, Docket 84-1098PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge:
Appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern Dis trict of New York convicting Ernest Mendel (Mendel) and Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. (M & S), following a bench trial before Whitman Knapp, Judge, of making and causing to be made false representations and statements to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, §§ 1001 and 1002. 1 We vacate that part of the judgment convicting Mendel and order a new trial. We affirm that part of the judgment convicting M & S.
Background
M & S was engaged…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Travis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. NataleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Arthur L. Doe, A/K/A "Butchy"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.