Legal Opinion
United States v. Natale
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 28, 1975No. Nos. 307, 308, Dockets 75-1276, 75-1298PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This criminal appeal involves a number of trial court rulings but no question of sufficiency of the evidence of applicability of the statute. Joseph Natale and Frank Russo appeal from judgments of conviction entered on May 15, 1975, after a jury trial in the Southern District of New York before Judge Lloyd F. MacMahon. They were tried, along with a codefendant, John Conti, under a three count indictment which charged them with a conspiracy to collect extensions of credit by extortionate means, with the substantive crime of using such means to collect such extensions, 18…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.