People v. Raich
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying a new trial in a case where the defendant was charged with the commission of the felony defined by section 288 of the Penal Code.
But two points are presented in support of the appeal— namely, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, in this, that the testimony of the complaining witness upon which the ease of the people was primarily rested, was not corroborated, and that her testimony is so inherently improbable and incredible that it amounts to no evidence at all.
Neither point is well taken.…
2Cited by19 opinions
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Sanborn v. SanbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. WilderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.